Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Fungsi dan Kewenangan Legislasi Dewan Perwakilan Daerah (DPD) dalam Sistem Parlemen Bikameral (Dua Kamar) Negara Republik Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59841/intellektika.v3i1.2037Keywords:
Legislative Authority, Regional Representative Council, Legislative FunctionAbstract
In the process of forming a law or legislation, the DPD does not have the power to decide or play a role in the decision-making process at all. Even though there are support requirements to become a member of the DPR. This means that the quality of the legitimacy of DPD members is not at all balanced by the quality of their authority as representatives of the regional people. The aim of this research is to analyze the function and authority of the Regional Representative Council in the Structural Institution of the Republic of Indonesia State Legislative Institution and how to optimize the function and legislative authority of the Regional Representative Council. The type of research we use is normative legal research, namely research carried out by examining the body of literature or secondary data. Strengthening the authority of the DPD by consistently incorporating the Constitutional Court's decisions into statutory regulations and other regulations under it. This is being done pending the issuance of the fifth amendment to the 1945 Constitution. The current revision of the MD3 Law has not yet adopted the authority of the DPD in accordance with the Constitutional Court's decision. The need for the fifth amendment is to reorganize the function of legislation firmly and clearly in the 1945 Constitution, because by reorganizing the function of legislation it will touch all institutions, including the DPR, DPD, President and other institutions.
References
Arinanto, S. (2002). Setelah Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Menjadi “Bikameral”.
Asshiddiqie, J. (n.d.). Lembaga perwakilan dan permusyawaratan rakyat tingkat pusat. Jimly School website. Retrieved from www.jimlyschool.com
Evans, K. (2002). Seputar sistem bikameral. Jakarta: CPPS Paramadina dan Partnership for Governance Reform in Indonesia.
Gusman, I. (2014a). Putusan MK harus masuk dalam pembahasan RUU MD3. Majalah Forum, 62.
Gusman, I. (2014b). Tanpa libatkan DPD RI, UU cacat formal. Koran Sindo.
Harun, R. (2006). Mewadahi tuntutan DPD. Jakarta: Kelompok DPD di MPR RI.
Isra, S. (2007). Menelisik model parlemen. Jurnal Media Hukum, 14(2).
Isra, S., & Mochtar, Z. A. (2007). Konsep ideal bikameral yang sesuai dengan keadaan dan pemerintahan demokratis di Indonesia. Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Kartasasmita, G. (2005). DPD dan penguatan demokrasi. Peningkatan peran DPD pasca amandemen UUD 1945. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2023). Laporan Investigasi Kasus Korupsi BTS Kominfo 2023.
Mahfud, M. (2007). Perdebatan hukum tata negara pasca amandemen konstitusi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Mochtar, Z. A. (2007). Pengamanan parlemen didalam institusi negara. Jakarta: Sekjen DPD Kerjasama dengan UNDIP.
Palguna, I. D. G. (2003). Susunan dan kedudukan Dewan Perwakilan Daerah. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal MPR.
Piliang, I. J., & Susanti, B. (2006). Untuk apa DPD RI. Jakarta: Kelompok DPD di MPR RI.
Sherlock, S. (2006). Indonesia’s regional representative assembly: Democracy, representation and the regions: A report on the Dewan Perwakilan Daerah (DPD). Canberra: Centre for Democratic Institutions.
Susanti, B. (2007). Penguatan kewenangan DPD dan pasal-pasal lain yang terkait di bidang legislasi, anggaran, dan pengawasan. Pertemuan Ahli Hukum Tata Negara. Makassar: Universitas 45 Makassar.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Intellektika : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.