Penghapusan Merek WIN Terdaftar yang Tidak Digunakan dalam Kegiatan Perdagangan Berdasarkan Kepentingan Pihak Ketiga
Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat Nomor 45/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2023/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59841/intellektika.v3i1.2034Keywords:
Trademark Expungement Lawsuit, Non-use Registered Trademark, WINAbstract
The right holder of a trademark has full validity to use his own trademark or license it to other parties, including delisting of its own trademark. Delisting of a mark could be done by the owner of the relevant mark, based on initiative of the minister or third party’s interest. Hongyunhonghe Tobacco (Group) Co. Ltd. (Plaintiff) has filed a lawsuit for the delisting of registered WIN trademark owned by PT Sumatra Tobacco Trading Company (Defendant). The issues raised are how the legal arrangements for the delisting of trademarks by third party’s interested and the suitability of the application of the law in Decision Number 45/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2023/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pstreviewed based on the applicable trademark rules. Normative juridical research type through a statutory study approach and literature study-based data collection. Qualitative data analysis with prescriptive nature. The provisions of Article 74 paragraph (1) jo. Article 85 of the Trademark Law regulates the delisting of registered trademarks filed third party’s interested in the form of a lawsuit to the Chairman of the Central Jakarta Commercial Court. The application of the law applied in the decision is erroneous and states the Plaintiff is not interested. Law enforcement is one of the factors that affect the effectiveness and utilities of the law for the community. Trademarks that have been obtained should be used as well as possible in accordance with the term of protection, so as not to cause a gap for other parties to conduct the delisting of registered trademarks.
References
Amiruddin, A., & Zainal Asikin, H. (2016). Pengantar metode penelitian hukum (Introduction to legal research methods). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Ardlini Eta Pithalo, & Kholis Roisah. (2023). Pembatalan dan penghapusan merek dagang karena ada persamaan pada pokoknya. Jurnal Notaris, 16(2), 907-915. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v16i2.41566
Citra Ramadhan, et al. (2023). Buku ajar hak kekayaan intelektual (Textbook on intellectual property rights). Medan: Universitas Medan Area Press.
Dino Rizka Afdhali, & Taufiqqurohman Syahuri. (2023). Idealitas penegakkan hukum ditinjau dari perspektif teori tujuan hukum. Collegium Studiosum Journal, 6(2), 555-561. https://doi.org/10.56301/csj.v6i2.1078
Djaenab. (2018). Efektifitas dan berfungsinya hukum dalam masyarakat. Ash-Shahabah Jurnal Pendidikan dan Studi Islam, 4(2), 148-153. https://doi.org/10.59638/ash.v4i2.191
Elisabeth Nurhaini Butarbutar. (2018). Metode penelitian hukum. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Fathiya Al’Uzma, et al. (2023). Analisis putusan dan pertimbangan hukum dalam perkara sengketa merek antara Starbucks Corporation melawan Sumatera Tobacco Trading Company (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 836K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2022). Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 2(4), 355-364. https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v2i4.154
Galuh Orlando. (2022). Efektivitas hukum dan fungsi hukum di Indonesia. Tarbiyah bil Qalam Jurnal Pendidikan Agama & Sains, 6(1), 51-28. https://ejurnal.stita.ac.id/index.php/TBQ/article/view/77
Inggal Ayu Noorsanti, & Ristina Yudhanti. (2023). Kemanfaatan hukum Jeremy Bentham relevansinya dengan kebijakan pemerintah melalui bantuan langsung tunai dana desa. Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, 3(2), 183-193. https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/jurisprudence/index
Jeffry Latumahina. (2022). Analisis perlindungan hukum hak kekayaan intelektual atas merek terdaftar. Jurnal Mitra Manajemen, 6(9), 513-524. https://doi.org/10.52160/ejmm.v6i9.641
Khoirul Hidayah. (2017). Hukum hak kekayaan intelektual (Intellectual property law). Malang: Setara Press.
Made Wipra Pratistita, & Suherman. (2024). Analisis hukum gugatan penghapusan merek Marlin (Astra Honda Motor) oleh Trek Bicycle Corporation (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 396K/Pdt.Sus-HKI.2024). Jurnal Penelitian, 8(1), 241-252. https://doi.org/10.36841/cermin_unars.v8i1.4536
Mukti Fajar, & Yulianto Achmad. (2010). Dualisme penelitian hukum normatif dan empiris (Duality of normative and empirical legal research). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Nanda Dwi Rizkia, & Hardi Fardiansyah. (2022). Hak kekayaan intelektual suatu pengantar (Introduction to intellectual property rights). Bandung: Widina Bhakti Persada Bandung.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2016). Penelitian hukum (Legal research). Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Salim HS, & Erlies Septiana Nurbani. (2013). Penerapan teori hukum pada penulisan tesis dan disertasi (Application of legal theory in writing theses and dissertations). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Soerjono Soekanto. (2015). Pengantar penelitian hukum (Introduction to legal research). Depok: Universitas Indonesia Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Intellektika : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
