Ontologi: Memahami Hakikat Realitas dan Aplikasinya dalam Ilmu Akuntansi

Authors

  • Pransida Budaya Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Riduan Riduan Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Darwin Effendi Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Zainul Rifqi Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Arianda Pratama Universitas PGRI Palembang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59841/inoved.v3i2.2929

Keywords:

Accounting Objects, Accounting Reality, Accounting Science, Ontology, Philosophy of Science

Abstract

This article comprehensively reviews the definition of ontology as a branch of philosophy that studies the nature of existence or reality. Furthermore, the discussion focuses on the application of the concept of ontology in the context of accounting science. It explains how ontology influences our understanding of the objects of accounting study, ranging from assets, liabilities, equity, to economic transactions. A deep understanding of ontology is expected to provide a strong basic framework for the development of more relevant and robust accounting theories and practices.

References

Bakhtiar, A. (2009). Filsafat ilmu: Suatu kajian dalam dimensi ontologis, epistemologis, dan aksiologis. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Budi, T. (2018). Filsafat ilmu: Konsep dasar dan aplikasinya. Kencana.

Chambers, R. J. (1966). Accounting, evaluation and economic behavior. Prentice-Hall.

Ghozali, I. (2016). Teori akuntansi. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Harahap, S. S. (2011). Teori akuntansi. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Hasan, A. (2019). Epistemologi dan ontologi ilmu akuntansi. Jurnal Akuntansi Kontemporer, 1(1), 1–15.

Kaelan. (2010). Metode penelitian kualitatif interdisipliner. Paradigma.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business School Press.

Lehman, G. (2000). The ontology of the accounting entity. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(7), 633–652.

Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Ed. revisi). Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyadi. (2016). Akuntansi manajemen. Salemba Empat.

Ryan, B., Scapens, R. W., & Theobald, M. (2002). Research methodologies and accounting. Thomson Learning.

Schroeder, R. G., Clark, M. W., & Cathey, J. M. (2011). Financial accounting theory and analysis: Text and cases (10th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Sismanto, Y. (2017). Filsafat ilmu akuntansi: Paradigma, ontologi, epistemologi, dan aksiologi. Pustaka Pelajar.

Susanto, A. (2013). Sistem informasi akuntansi: Struktur pengendalian risiko pengembangan. Lingga Jaya.

Suwardjono. (2005). Teori akuntansi: Perekayasaan pelaporan keuangan. BPFE.

Tjahjono, H. K. (2002). Filsafat ilmu: Ontologi, epistemologi, dan aksiologi ilmu pengetahuan. Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang Press.

Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1986). Positive accounting theory. Prentice-Hall.

Zreik, K. (2001). Ontology, epistemology and the accounting process. The International Journal of Accounting and Finance, 3(2), 112–128.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-21

How to Cite

Pransida Budaya, Riduan Riduan, Darwin Effendi, Zainul Rifqi, & Arianda Pratama. (2025). Ontologi: Memahami Hakikat Realitas dan Aplikasinya dalam Ilmu Akuntansi . Journal Innovation In Education, 3(2), 351–356. https://doi.org/10.59841/inoved.v3i2.2929

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.