Efektifitas Mediasi dalam Sengketa Wanprestasi Pembelian Elektronik
Studi Kasus Barang Cacat
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59841/intellektika.v3i4.2821Keywords:
mediation, default, defective-goods, dispute-resolution, physical-storeAbstract
Direct (offline) purchase transactions are still the choice of the public, especially to ensure the physical condition of the goods. However, in direct purchases of electronic goods (offline) in physical stores, disputes often arise when the purchased goods are defective or damaged after several days of use. Cases like this are a form of default by the seller. One alternative dispute resolution that can be used is mediation, which is a settlement process with the help of a neutral third party to reach a mutual agreement. In this case, an analysis of the effectiveness of mediation was carried out in resolving default disputes related to defective goods in electronic purchases in physical stores. Using case studies and qualitative approaches, it was found that mediation is effective if both parties have good intentions and are willing to communicate openly. Mediation can accelerate dispute resolution without having to go through a long and expensive legal process.
References
Indriani, I., Evita, M. A. P., & Rai, N. D. (2020). Keabsahan kesepakatan penyelesaian sengketa wanprestasi melalui mekanisme mediasi yang tidak didaftarkan ke Pengadilan Negeri. Jurnal Kertha Wicara, 9(4), 1–12.
Meliala, A. Q. S. (1985). Pokok-pokok hukum perjanjian. Liberty.
Miru, A. (2007). Hukum kontrak dan perancangan kontrak. Rajawali Pers.
Pasal 1234 dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. (n.d.). Burgerlijk Wetboek (BW). (Sumber hukum primer, tidak perlu dicetak miring atau diberi tempat terbit.)
Prodjodikoro, W. (1974). Asas-asas hukum perdata (Cet. VI). Sumur.
Putra, D. S., & Putra, M. A. P. (2024). Pengaturan mediasi sebagai alternatif penyelesaian sengketa wanprestasi dalam transaksi jual beli online. Jurnal Kertha Negara, 12(1), 55–67.
Rahim, I. A., & Laksana, G. N. D. (2024). Perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen atas cacatnya produk yang diterimanya dalam perdagangan e-commerce. Jurnal Kertha Sanaya, 13(2), 78–89.
Rosmawati. (2018). Pokok-pokok hukum perlindungan konsumen. Kencana.
Subekti, R. (2001). Pokok-pokok hukum perdata (Cet. XXIX). PT Intermasa.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen, Pasal 45 ayat (2).
Wahyudi, K., Budiartha, P., & Ujiant, P. (2022). Perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen akibat cacat produk pada saat produksi ditinjau dari Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 1999. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 5(1), 112–123.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Intellektika : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
