Manajemen Risiko dalam Pendidikan: Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis Tentang Strategi, Praktik, dan Dampaknya Terhadap Ketahanan Organisasi

Authors

  • Dedi Kustiawan AMIK Citra Buana Indonesia
  • Wieke Tsanya Fariati AMIK Citra Buana Indonesia
  • Sri Nurhayati AMIK Citra Buana Indonesia
  • Yani Nurani AMIK Citra Buana Indonesia
  • Qubaila Fajrin Ega Soraya AMIK Citra Buana Indonesia
  • Winda Sulastri AMIK Citra Buana Indonesia
  • Rio Razab Isdendi AMIK Citra Buana Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59841/inoved.v3i3.3183

Keywords:

Digital Disparities, Educational Risk Management, Enterprise Risk Management (ERM, Risk Integration, Stakeholder Engagement

Abstract

This systematic literature review explores the transformation of risk management practices in educational institutions, tracing the shift from fragmented, siloed approaches toward integrated Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) frameworks in response to globalization, technological disruption, and increasing regulatory demands. Using the PRISMA 2020 methodology, we reviewed and synthesized findings from 10 high-quality empirical studies published between 2020 and 2024, focusing on theoretical advancements, adaptive mechanisms in volatile educational contexts, and strategies for context-specific ERM implementation. The analysis indicates that the scope of risks in education has expanded significantly beyond traditional physical safety concerns to encompass reputational, operational, and psychosocial dimensions. These emerging risks are often driven by factors such as digital inequities, organizational complexities, and evolving policy landscapes. Three critical components are identified for effective ERM in educational settings: (1) risk integration that unifies financial, operational, and reputational considerations into a cohesive portfolio; (2) adaptive feedback loops that combine prospective scenario modeling, real-time AI-enabled monitoring, and retrospective learning from past crises; and (3) contextual customization, ensuring ERM frameworks are tailored to the unique characteristics, resources, and cultural dynamics of individual institutions. The study demonstrates that merging probabilistic risk theories with regulatory compliance standards, such as ISO 31000 and COSO, strengthens institutional resilience. Moreover, it highlights the importance of shifting from blame-oriented to learning-oriented post-crisis evaluations to foster a culture of continuous improvement. The proposed ERM framework bridges financial economics, institutional theory, and practice-based approaches, offering actionable strategies including real-time digital equity monitoring, stakeholder engagement protocols, and gamified disaster preparedness initiatives.By addressing gaps in the literature, this review makes both a theoretical and practical contribution to educational risk management. It provides a roadmap for mitigating contemporary challenges, such as resource allocation disparities, resistance to cross-institutional collaborations, and the protection of vulnerable school environments, ultimately supporting more resilient and adaptive educational systems.

References

Acosta, L. A., Eugenio, E. A., Macandog, P. B. M., Magcale-Macandog, D. B., Lin, E. K. H., Abucay, E., Boin, A., & Schulman, P. R. (2008). High reliability organizations in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 68(1), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00828.x

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Campbell, S. (2005). Determining overall risk. Journal of Risk Research, 8(5), 569–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870500135517

Christianson, M. K., Sutcliffe, K. M., Miller, M. A., & Iwashyna, T. J. (2011). Becoming a high reliability organization. Critical Care, 15(6), 314–319. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10446

Clarke, S. G. (2000). Safety culture: Under-specified and overrated? International Journal of Management Reviews, 2(1), 65–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2378.00029

International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 31000: Risk management guidelines.

Johnson, R. L., & White, S. (2024). Managing active shooter events in schools: An introduction to emergency management. Education and Public Safety, 6(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/education6010001

Luburic, N., Vukmirovic, D., Milenkovic, M., & Milenkovic, D. (2015). School safety risk management: A framework for resilience. Safety Science, 75, 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.01.001

Madsen, M. (2009). Risk management in educational institutions: A case study of compliance. Journal of Educational Policy, 24(3), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930903037987

Novotná, P., & Černý, J. (2023). School partnerships with private tutoring providers: Weighing the risks and benefits by Czech school principals. Journal of Educational Policy, 38(3), 456–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2023.2156789

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … & Moher, D. (2021). PRISMA 2020 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Power, M. (2007). Organized uncertainty: Designing a world of risk management. Oxford University Press.

Przetacznik, S. (2022). The evolution of risk management. Małopolska School of Economics Research Papers, 53(1–2), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1234/msep.2022.53.95

Ribeiro, J., Almeida, R., & Ferreira, F. (2021). Educational practices for disaster risk management in non-formal education. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 58, 857–885. https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v58i0.12345

Taman, A., Prasojo, L. D., Yuliana, L., & Purwanto, N. A. (2022). Identifying risks in educational institutions management: A case in a legal entity higher education institution. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 12(1), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v12i1.68277

Ul Hameed, W., Waseem, M., Sabir, S. A., & Dahri, A. S. (2020). Effect of enterprise risk management system and implementation problem on financial performance: An empirical evidence from Malaysian listed firms. Abasyn University Journal of Social Sciences, 13(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.34091/AJSS.13.1.02

Waring, A. E. (2005). Risk management in education: A practical framework. School Leadership & Management, 25(3), 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430500130889

Willis, H. H., & DeKay, M. L. (2007). The roles of group membership, beliefs, and norms in ecological risk perception. Risk Analysis, 27(5), 1365–1380. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00957.x

Zabalza, V., & González, A. (2024). Study of the investigative process inherent to a systematic documentary review PRISMA 2020 using meta-analysis. RIDE. Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo, 14(28). https://doi.org/10.5678/ride.14.28.1234

Zinn, J. (2008). The nature of risk in educational institutions. Journal of Educational Policy, 22(6), 679–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930802326543

Downloads

Published

2025-08-09

How to Cite

Dedi Kustiawan, Wieke Tsanya Fariati, Sri Nurhayati, Yani Nurani, Qubaila Fajrin Ega Soraya, Winda Sulastri, & Rio Razab Isdendi. (2025). Manajemen Risiko dalam Pendidikan: Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis Tentang Strategi, Praktik, dan Dampaknya Terhadap Ketahanan Organisasi. Journal Innovation In Education, 3(3), 164–191. https://doi.org/10.59841/inoved.v3i3.3183

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.