Realita Sosial Dalam Naskah Drama Abad Tak Bermoral Karya Munief Doang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59841/inoved.v3i3.3201Keywords:
Literary works, Sociology of literature, Drama, Socio-cultural values, Immoral AgeAbstract
Literary works are the result of thought, imagination, and reflection of the culture of a community group. Every society with a particular culture will produce literary works that contain depictions of human interactions with each other and their relationship with the surrounding environment. In this context, literary works not only serve as a form of aesthetic expression of the author regarding the reality he observes, but also become a means to convey life values. A good literary work is generally able to guide, educate, and provide enlightenment to its readers through the moral messages and truth values contained therein. In addition to its entertainment function, literary works also serve as a medium of social control conveyed in a fictional dimension. This is due to the fact that literary works are born from objective reality which is then processed through the author's imagination into a new reality full of meaning. In Indonesia, imaginative literary works are generally divided into three main forms, namely poetry, fiction or narrative prose, and drama. Drama, as a form of literary work, has its own uniqueness because it presents dialogue, plot, and characters directly, thus containing elements of beauty as well as implicit messages that are worthy of analysis. This research focuses on the analysis of the drama "Abad Tak Bermoral" by Munief Doang using a sociological approach to literature. This approach was chosen because it can reveal the relationship between literary works and the socio-cultural realities that underlie them. Through this analysis, the author attempts to identify the life values, social critique, and cultural portraits implied in the work. Thus, this drama is viewed not only as an aesthetic work of art but also as a social document reflecting the author's perspective on the dynamics of social life in his time.
References
Damono, S. D. (2002). Pedoman penelitian sosiologi sastra. Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa.
Damono, S. D. (2013). Sosiologi sastra. Jakarta: Editum.
Faruk. (2012). Pengantar sosiologi sastra: Dari strukturalisme genetik sampai post-modernisme. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Haryamawan, R. M. A. (1988). Dramaturgi. Bandung: CV Rosda.
Junus, U. (1986). Sosiologi sastra: Persoalan teori dan metode. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Kibriya, M. (2019). Kajian drama dan teater. Jakarta: Pustaka Ilmu.
Kibriya, S., & Jones, G. (2019). The impact of a safe learning environment in schools on students’ learning outcomes: Evidence from Tanzania. Quality Assurance in Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-11-2019-0124
Luxemburg, J. van, Hartoko, D. (Penerj.). (1984). Pengantar ilmu sastra. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Luxemburg, J., Bal, M., & Weststeijn, W. G. (1989). Pengantar ilmu sastra (A. Teeuw, Penerj.). Jakarta: Gramedia.
Nurgiyantoro, B. (2010). Penilaian pembelajaran bahasa. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Nurudin. (2007). Pengantar komunikasi massa. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Ratna, N. K. (2003). Paradigma sosiologi sastra. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Retno, D. (2018). Pesan moral dalam tayangan drama komedi di media Youtube. Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang Repository. Diakses pada 14 Juni 2025, dari https://eprints.umm.ac.id/41011/
Waluyo, H. J. (2001). Drama: Teori dan pengajarannya. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Watt, I. (1985). Literature and society. Dalam R. Wilson (Ed.), The arts in society (hlm. xx-xx). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Wellek, R., & Warren, A. (1985). Teori kesusastraan. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.
Wellek, R., & Warren, A. (2014). Teori kesusastraan (M. B. D. Budianta, Penerj.). Jakarta: Gramedia.
Wiyatmi. (2013). Sosiologi sastra. Yogyakarta: Kanwa Publisher.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal Innovation In Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





