Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Perusahaan dari Aspek Keuangan Berdasarkan Keputusan Menteri BUMN Nomor: KEP-100/MBU/2002

(Studi Kasus Pada PT. Krakatau Steel (Persero) Tbk Periode 2017-2021)

Authors

  • Meri Dita Rahayu Universitas Islam Kadiri
  • Indah Listyani Universitas Islam Kadiri
  • Edi Murdiyanto Universitas Islam Kadiri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59841/glory.v1i4.372

Keywords:

BUMN Health, Financial Aspects, Krakatau Steel (Persero)

Abstract

This research aims to determine the level of company health from a financial aspect based on the Decree of the Minister of BUMN Number: KEP-100/MBU/2002 at PT. Krakatau Steel (Persero) Tbk for the 2017-2021 period. The method used in this research is quantitative descriptive. This health level assessment uses 8 financial aspect indicators, namely ROE, ROI, Cash Ratio, Current Ratio, Collection Periods, Inventory Turnover, Total Asset Turn Over, and Total Own Capital to Total Assets. Based on the research results, PT. Krakatau Steel (Persero) Tbk for the 2017-2021 period experienced increases and decreases as seen from 8 financial ratio indicators. The financial health assessment in 2017 and 2018 was in the unhealthy predicate in the BBB category with a final score of 55 in 2017 and 53.21 in 2018, however in 2019 it was in the unhealthy predicate in the CCC category with a final score of 30, whereas in 2020 it was ranked as unhealthy in the BB category with a final score of 47.14 and in 2021 it was ranked as unhealthy in the BBB category with a final score of 55. So it can be concluded that the financial health of PT. Krakatau Steel (Persero) Tbk is in an unhealthy condition.

References

Anonim. (2021, 21 September). Presiden: Industri Baja Pilar Penting Pertumbuhan Ekonomi. Kementerian Sekretariat Negara [Online], halaman 1. Tersedia: https://www.setneg.go.id/baca/index/presiden_industri_baja_pilar_penting_pertumbuhan_ekonomi#:~:text=Industri baja merupakan sektor yang,%2C” ucap Presiden Joko Widodo. [16 Desember 2022].

Harahap, S. S. (2011). Analisis Kritis Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Kasmir. (2015). Pengantar Manajemen Keuangan. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

______. (2021). Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Keputusan Menteri BUMN Nomor: KEP-100/MBU/2002 Tentang Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Badan Usaha Milik Negara.

Mutia, A. (2022, 4 April). Krakatau Steel Kembali Catatkan Laba Bersih pada 2021. Databoks Katadata [Online], halaman 1. Tersedia: https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/04/04/krakatau-steel-kembali-catatkan-laba-bersih-pada-2021. [18 Desember 2022].

Purnamawati, I. G. A. (2018). Akuntansi dan Implementasi dalam Koperasi dan UMKM. Depok: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Ramalan, S. (2021, 30 September). Walau Terindikasi Korupsi, Erick Ingin Proyek Blast Furnace KRAS Dilanjutkan. IDX Channel [Online], halaman 1. Tersedia: https://www.idxchannel.com/economics/walau-terindikasi-korupsi-erick-ingin-proyek-blast-furnace-kras-dilanjutkan. [18 Desember 2022].

Rika, H. (2020, 28 Januari). Krakatau Steel Restrukturisasi Utang Rp 30 T. CNN Indonesia [Online], halaman 1. Tersedia:. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20200128190732-85-469552/krakatau-steel-restrukturisasi-utang-rp30-t. [18 Desember 2022].

Rudianto. (2021). Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta: PT. Gelora Aksara Pratama.

Sujarweni, V. W. (2022). Analisis Laporan Keuangan Teori, Aplikasi & Hasil Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press.

Wareza, M. (2021, 28 September). Ini Proyek KRAS Rp 12 T yang Mangkrak & Bikin Erick Murka. CNBC Indonnesia [Online], halaman 1. Tersedia: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/market/20210928151938-17-279825/ini-proyek-kras-rp-12-t-yang-mangkrak-bikin-erick-murka. [18 Desember 2022].

Downloads

Published

2023-09-27

How to Cite

Meri Dita Rahayu, Indah Listyani, & Edi Murdiyanto. (2023). Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Perusahaan dari Aspek Keuangan Berdasarkan Keputusan Menteri BUMN Nomor: KEP-100/MBU/2002 : (Studi Kasus Pada PT. Krakatau Steel (Persero) Tbk Periode 2017-2021). Global Leadership Organizational Research in Management, 1(4), 215–227. https://doi.org/10.59841/glory.v1i4.372

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.