Sumber Daya dan Strategi Inovasi dalam Kewirausahaan : Analisis Sistematis dengan Metode Systematic Literature Review (SLR)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59841/glory.v3i2.2590Keywords:
Resources, innovation, strategy, entrepreneurship, PRISMAAbstract
Innovation is a key element in improving business competitiveness and sustainability. This study uses the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method to analyse the relationship between resources and innovation strategies in entrepreneurship. A total of 22 Scopus-indexed articles were reviewed using the PRISMA approach, focusing on the types of resources (human, financial, technological, informational, and physical) and forms of innovation (product, process, and managerial). The results show that product innovation is largely supported by human resources and technology, where the skills and creativity of the workforce play an important role in the development of new products. Process innovation relies on technology and information, especially in production efficiency and operational digitalisation. Meanwhile, managerial innovation is closely related to human resource management and organisational strategy, which enables companies to be more adaptive to market changes. This study enriches the Resource-Based View (RBV) and Dynamic Capabilities theories, and provides insights for entrepreneurs and policy makers in developing resource-based innovation strategies. In conclusion, successful innovation in entrepreneurship depends on optimal resource utilisation and appropriate policy support to create sustainable innovation.
References
Ahmić, A., & Ahmić Šahović, L. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Impact on the Sustainable Entrepreneurial Process. Journal of Ecohumanism. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v4i2.5934
Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Barney, J. B. (2001). Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4011938
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business Press.
Chiangnangam, S., Manorom, P., & Chansanam, W. (2025). Integrating Management and Marketing Strategies in Organic Farming: A Topic Modeling Analysis of Sustainable Development and Entrepreneurship. International Review of Management and Marketing. https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.17559
Dosi, G. (1988). Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 26(3), 1120–1171. https://doi.org/10.2307/2726526
Dragin, A. S., et al. (2024). Exploring the Link Between Openness and Entrepreneurial Capacity in Young People. Land (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/land13111827
Gao, Y. (2025). Looking for the Impact of Entrepreneurship on Regional Economic Resilience in China. Sustainability (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041397
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The Dynamic Resource‐Based View: Capability Lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997–1010. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.332
Huang, J., & Zhou, P. (2025). Open Innovation and Entrepreneurship: A Review from the Perspective of Sustainable Business Models. Sustainability (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17030939
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Nayak, M., et al. (2025). Digital Platforms’ Use in SMEs – A Critical Analysis of Entrepreneurs’ Behaviour. Cogent Economics & Finance. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2025.2461337
Nurcayaa, I. N., et al. (2025). Business Performance Concept Development Apparel Industry MSMEs in Bali. Uncertain Supply Chain Management. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2023.9.019
O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator’s Dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002
Prenzel, P., et al. (2024). Cultural Diversity and Innovative Entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-024-00888-1
Rocha, R. G., Paço, A., Alves, H., & Dias-Cabral, C. (2024). Unleashing the Power of Responsible Knowledge Management: A Catalyst for Sustainable Business Transformation. Knowledge Management & E-Learning. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2024.16.036
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard University Press.
Silva, W. J., et al. (2024). Amaro’s Business Model Innovation: DNVB or Platform?. Revista de Gestão (Emerald Publishing). https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-08-2022-0115
Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450–463. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.17407911
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
Verma, S. K., et al. (2025). Diverse Perspectives on Entrepreneurship: Analyzing Gender and Age-Related Differences in Perceptions. Multidisciplinary Review. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2025049
Walzer, A. N., et al. (2025). Bug or Feature? Institutional Misalignments Between Construction Technology and Venture Capital. Construction Management and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2024.2401818
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Global Leadership Organizational Research in Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.