Sumber Daya dan Strategi Inovasi dalam Kewirausahaan : Analisis Sistematis dengan Metode Systematic Literature Review (SLR)

Authors

  • Feri Andika Prasetya Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Kevin Ghulaman Silmi Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Agung Winarno Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Wening Patmi Rahayu Universitas Negeri Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59841/glory.v3i2.2590

Keywords:

Resources, innovation, strategy, entrepreneurship, PRISMA

Abstract

Innovation is a key element in improving business competitiveness and sustainability. This study uses the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method to analyse the relationship between resources and innovation strategies in entrepreneurship. A total of 22 Scopus-indexed articles were reviewed using the PRISMA approach, focusing on the types of resources (human, financial, technological, informational, and physical) and forms of innovation (product, process, and managerial). The results show that product innovation is largely supported by human resources and technology, where the skills and creativity of the workforce play an important role in the development of new products. Process innovation relies on technology and information, especially in production efficiency and operational digitalisation. Meanwhile, managerial innovation is closely related to human resource management and organisational strategy, which enables companies to be more adaptive to market changes. This study enriches the Resource-Based View (RBV) and Dynamic Capabilities theories, and provides insights for entrepreneurs and policy makers in developing resource-based innovation strategies. In conclusion, successful innovation in entrepreneurship depends on optimal resource utilisation and appropriate policy support to create sustainable innovation.

References

Ahmić, A., & Ahmić Šahović, L. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Impact on the Sustainable Entrepreneurial Process. Journal of Ecohumanism. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v4i2.5934

Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Barney, J. B. (2001). Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4011938

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business Press.

Chiangnangam, S., Manorom, P., & Chansanam, W. (2025). Integrating Management and Marketing Strategies in Organic Farming: A Topic Modeling Analysis of Sustainable Development and Entrepreneurship. International Review of Management and Marketing. https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.17559

Dosi, G. (1988). Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 26(3), 1120–1171. https://doi.org/10.2307/2726526

Dragin, A. S., et al. (2024). Exploring the Link Between Openness and Entrepreneurial Capacity in Young People. Land (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/land13111827

Gao, Y. (2025). Looking for the Impact of Entrepreneurship on Regional Economic Resilience in China. Sustainability (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041397

Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110

Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The Dynamic Resource‐Based View: Capability Lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997–1010. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.332

Huang, J., & Zhou, P. (2025). Open Innovation and Entrepreneurship: A Review from the Perspective of Sustainable Business Models. Sustainability (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17030939

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Nayak, M., et al. (2025). Digital Platforms’ Use in SMEs – A Critical Analysis of Entrepreneurs’ Behaviour. Cogent Economics & Finance. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2025.2461337

Nurcayaa, I. N., et al. (2025). Business Performance Concept Development Apparel Industry MSMEs in Bali. Uncertain Supply Chain Management. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2023.9.019

O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator’s Dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002

Prenzel, P., et al. (2024). Cultural Diversity and Innovative Entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-024-00888-1

Rocha, R. G., Paço, A., Alves, H., & Dias-Cabral, C. (2024). Unleashing the Power of Responsible Knowledge Management: A Catalyst for Sustainable Business Transformation. Knowledge Management & E-Learning. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2024.16.036

Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard University Press.

Silva, W. J., et al. (2024). Amaro’s Business Model Innovation: DNVB or Platform?. Revista de Gestão (Emerald Publishing). https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-08-2022-0115

Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450–463. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.17407911

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

Verma, S. K., et al. (2025). Diverse Perspectives on Entrepreneurship: Analyzing Gender and Age-Related Differences in Perceptions. Multidisciplinary Review. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2025049

Walzer, A. N., et al. (2025). Bug or Feature? Institutional Misalignments Between Construction Technology and Venture Capital. Construction Management and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2024.2401818

Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207

Downloads

Published

2025-04-23

How to Cite

Feri Andika Prasetya, Kevin Ghulaman Silmi, Agung Winarno, & Wening Patmi Rahayu. (2025). Sumber Daya dan Strategi Inovasi dalam Kewirausahaan : Analisis Sistematis dengan Metode Systematic Literature Review (SLR). Global Leadership Organizational Research in Management, 3(2), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.59841/glory.v3i2.2590

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.