Kritik Satire dalam Kolom Komentar Instagram @kementeriankegelapan mengenai Program Makanan Bergizi Gratis: Kajian Pragmatik

Ni Made Risma Dwiantari; I Wayan Simpen; I Nyoman Suparwa

doi:10.59841/blaze.v4i2.3676

Authors

Ni Made Risma Dwiantari Universitas Udayana
I Wayan Simpen Universitas Udayana
I Nyoman Suparwa Universitas Udayana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59841/blaze.v4i2.3676

Keywords:

Conversational Implicature, Free Nutritious Meal Program, Instagram, Pragmatics, Social Satire

Abstract

This study aims to identify and determine the conversational implicatures that arise in the comment section of Instagram @kementeriankegelapan, which discusses the issue of poisoning related to the “Makanan Bergizi Gratis” (Free Nutritious Food) program. The research method used is qualitative with a pragmatic approach, which not only examines the surface meaning but also considers the context of the utterances. The theory applied in this study is the theory of implicature, specifically conversational implicatures. The data were obtained from the comment section of Instagram @kementeriankegelapan on posts concerning the poisoning issue of MBG (Free Nutritious Food). Data collection was conducted using the listening method (Simak) and the advanced technique of listening-without-participating in speech (simak libat bebas cakap). Data analysis used the referential identity method (padan referensial) with the advanced technique of selecting defining elements (pilah unsur penentu). The findings show that there are eight pieces of data in the form of conversations, each containing an idea or topic that specifically responds to the satirical post uploaded on the @kementeriankegelapan account regarding the MBG food-poisoning issue. The topics include: Azab (punishment), Tunggangan di Akhirat (conveyance/punishment in the afterlife), shouting “Long live Jokowi!”, MBG as a way to alleviate poverty, color codes, preventing fights/gang fights, maggots, and “licking”/being servile. Each of these topics has its own implicature.

References

Ananto, I., Sulistyaniningsih, E., & Putri, L. N. (2024). Analisis gaya bahasa satire pada kumpulan puisi Sajak Orang Biasa karya Yoyik Lembayung. Jurnal Pujangga, 1–14.

Decressac, A. (2024, November 24). What’s left unsaid: Conventional vs conversational implicature. Medium. Medium

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003

Griffin, D. (1994). Satire: A critical reintroduction. University Press of Kentucky.

Kholifah, U., & Sabardila, A. (2020). Analisis kesalahan gaya berbahasa pada sosial media Instagram dalam caption dan komentar. Jurnal NUSA (Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra), 352–364. https://doi.org/10.14710/nusa.15.3.352-364

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313

Muchlis. (2024, November 15). Jadikan kritik sebagai teman berpikir. Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Agama. Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Agama

Mulyana. (2001). Implikatur dalam kajian pragmatik. DIKSI, 53–63.

Nadar, F. X. (2009). Pragmatik dan penelitian pragmatik. Graha Ilmu.

Nasrullah, R. (2015). Media sosial: Perspektif komunikasi, budaya, dan sosioteknologi. Simbiosa Rekatama Media.

Rahardi, K. (2003). Berkenalan dengan ilmu bahasa pragmatik. Dioma.

Rahardi, K. (2005). Pragmatik: Kesantunan imperatif bahasa Indonesia. Erlangga.

Simpson, P. (2003). On the discourse of satire: Towards a stylistic model of satirical humour. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.2

Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan aneka teknik analisis bahasa. Sanata Dharma University Press.

Sugiyono. (2020). Metode penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Alfabeta.

Sumarlam, Pamungkas, S., & Susanti, R. (2023). Pemahaman dan kajian pragmatik. Bukukatta.

Wijana, I. D. P., & Rohmadi, M. (2011). Analisis wacana pragmatik: Kajian teori dan analisis. Yuma Pustaka.

Yanti, L., Suandi, N., & Suandi, N. (2021). Analisis kesantunan berbahasa warganet pada kolom komentar berita di media sosial Facebook. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Bahasa, 139–150. https://doi.org/10.23887/jurnal_bahasa.v10i1.405

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Yus, F. (2016). Humour and relevance. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.4

Zappavigna, M. (2012). Discourse of Twitter and social media: How we use language to create affiliation on the web. Continuum International Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472541642